Kaspersky Internet Security 2012 Patch Newspaper

Latest trending topics being covered on ZDNet including Reviews, Tech Industry, Security, Hardware, Apple, and Windows. Every Voting Machine at This Hacking Conference Got Totally Pwned. A noisy cheer went up from the crowd of hackers clustered around the voting machine tucked into the back corner of a casino conference roomtheyd just managed to load Rick Astleys Never Gonna Give You Up onto the Win. Vote, effectively rickrolling democracy. The hack was easy to execute. Two of the hackers working on the touchscreen voting machine, who identified only by their first names, Nick and Josh, had managed to install Windows Media Player on the machine and use it to play Astleys classic turned trolling track. The rickroll stunt was just one hack at the security conference DEF CON, which ran a three day Voting Machine Hacking Village to test the security of various machines and networks used in US elections. By the end of the weekend, every one of the roughly 3. Even though several of the exploits ended up paying tribute to Astley, theyre not jokesthey also present a serious lesson about the security vulnerabilities in voting machines that leave them open to tampering and manipulation. And the more vulnerable our voting infrastructure is shown to be, the less confidence voters may feel. The real takeaway is that you can install any software on this, Nick told Gizmodo. Theres no control. Nick had simply connected a keyboard to an exposed USB port at the back of the Win. Vote, which was used in elections as recently as 2. The voting village is the brainchild of a whos who list of security experts DEF CON founder Jeff Moss, cryptographer Matt Blaze, computer programmer Harri Hursti whose hack of Diebold voting machines in 2. Hursti Hack, and others. Researchers have been uncovering problems with voting systems for more than a decade, but the 2. Now the entire country, and maybe the world, is paying attention. But poll workers and former campaign officials say that their primary security concerns still arent with voting machines themselves but with protecting voter registration systems and defending against basic phishing attacks like the ones used to gain entry to the Democratic National Committees network. Meet the machinesThis is the great Satan, said Joseph Lorenzo Hall, the chief technologist at the Center for Democracy Technology, gesturing dismissively at the Win. Vote. The machine contains a cellular modem chip that allows its software to be updated remotely. Unfortunately, it also means that you can log into the damn thing from across the street if you know the right credentials, Hall explained. Whats hundreds of miles between networked friends The Win. Vote was the first machine to fall, with a hacker achieving remote code execution on the machine within the first hours of the village. Win. Votes were decertified by Virginias election board in 2. Gantt Template Excel. Kaspersky Internet Security 2012 Patch Newspaper' title='Kaspersky Internet Security 2012 Patch Newspaper' />American voting systems are largely cobbled together with antiquated technology. Voting machines can vary by state and county, and have to be certified by the Election Assistance Commission. But other devices, like the electronic poll books used in some jurisdictions to check in voters at their polling stations, arent subject to the certification process. Add in the voter registration databases themselveswhich were reportedly breached in 3. The machines are mostly new to the hackers at DEF CON. Theyre not very much fun, theyre like very boring ATMs, Hall joked. Its obvious that election systems arent very secure, but its important to understand why the security problems exist in the first place, and why theyre so hard to fix. The security industry encourages regular software updates to patch bugs and keep machines as impenetrable as possible. But updating the machines used in voting systems isnt as easy as installing a patch because the machines are subject to strict certification rules. Any major software update would require the state to redo its certification process. It costs over 1 million to get certified, Joshua Franklin, a security specialist with the National Institute of Standards and Technologys cybersecurity and privacy application unit, explained to attendees. Franklin said that even though the Election Assistance Commissions most recent election security standards were released in 2. The cost breaks down to about 3. Tom Stanionis, an IT manager for a county election agency in California who attended the village in his personal capacity. Most states just dont have the money. Whats hundreds of miles between networked friendsThe reality is, weve known about issues with voting machines for a long time, Stanionis told Gizmodo. Since purchasing brand new systems is out of the question, Stanionis said most states do their best to protect the systems they have, walling them off from the internet and storing them securely when theyre not being used. The rat king of decentralized state vendors and machines might actually be a good defense during a general electionit would force hackers to successfully target many disparate systems. It would be really hard in most jurisdictions to do anything to affect the voting machines, Stanionis said. Difficult doesnt mean impossible, though, and thats what DEF CONs hackers have set out to prove. Apple is rolling out facial recognition to unlock its new iPhone X, as has been rumored for months and confirmed in leaks over the weekend. Its iPhone day The. If a hacker tucked away in a corner of a Las Vegas casino can alter a vote count, then surely a nation state attacker can too. The thing you have to ask about any new technology is, compared with the technology that proceeded it, does this make that threat easier or harder Does it make us better off or worse off Blaze told attendees. Does whatever the technology were using make this threat an easier threat or a tougher threat Thats the question we havent really been sharply asking for very long. Email security and beyond. Robby Mook, the former manager of Hillary Clintons presidential campaign, is at DEF CON for the first time, and you can kind of tellhe looks a bit too clean cut for a conference often filled with hoodie wearing hackers. But hes got experience being targeted by nation state hackers that few other attendees can claim. Although hackers were hard at work down the hall figuring out how to alter vote tallies, Mook said he was still mostly worried about getting campaign workers to secure their email accounts with two factor authentication and stop retaining data for longer than necessary. Its much more a matter of culture and education than it is of spending enormous resources, Mook told Gizmodo. People in the security community know a lot of things instinctually that a campaign professional has never had exposure to, ever. Public confidence in elections is what gives government legitimacy. Mook, along with former Mitt Romney campaign manager Matt Rhoades and former Assistant Secretary of Defense Eric Rosenbach, launched an initiative at Harvard University earlier this summer focused on providing security resources to campaigns and election officials. The Defending Digital Democracy project received a founding investment from Facebook, and executives from the social network as well as Google and Crowd. Strike are helping establish an information sharing organization that will give political committees and campaigns quick access to threat intelligence. If you pull aside any campaign manager and say, Do you want to get hacked theyd say no, Mook told DEF CON attendees.